Welfare For The Rich

Welfare For The Rich; Or, Too Big To Fail.

Welfare as We Should Know It: Not For People With Less Than $10 Billon At Risk.

The NYT reports that the Treasury Department is coordinating the creation of a bailout fund that will be financed by several major banks, which will act to support the market in some of the exotic investment vehicles that they developed over the last decade. This should be reported as what it is, a bailout by the nanny state for the big boys who lack the ability to get by on their own in a free market.

The billionaire welfare boys will insist that this is not a government bailout because it does not use government money. They know better and so should the reporters who cover these issues.

Suppose that I decide to take a bet by investing in cattle futures. I know that one of the risks I face is that there will be a market run on cattle, depressing their price for a long period of time, or at least past the date where I will be forced to unload my futures. Now suppose that the government steps in with "major financial actors" to ensure through its monopoly powers and, in general, relaxation of the monopoly laws, that there are no temporary plunges in cattle prices, in effect "stabilizing" the market. This hugely increases the value of my bet on cattle futures.

This is exactly what the Treasury Department has done with the banks and their complicated investment instruments. The bailout may prove insufficient (these boys have shown a remarkable ability to be surprised by the weakness in the housing market recently), but it is nonetheless a government bailout that is of considerable potential value to the beneficiaries.

Arguably this bailout is still in the general public interest, since stable financial markets (assuming that the assets are actually stabilized near their long-term price) are desirable, but it is a subsidy to the banks for which the public may want to be compensated. After all, if people can get so bent out of shape about a $500 a month TANF check to mothers getting welfare, how would they feel about subsidies worth tens of billions of dollars to the richest people in the country? But, the media has to first inform the public about this act of charity to the wealthy.

Normxxx    
______________

The contents of any third-party letters/reports above do not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of any message or post by normxxx anywhere on this site is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. Such is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should always consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.