Send in the Clowns

Send in the Clowns [¹]

By Peter Schiff | 27 October 2007

Four leading members of the Bush administration's economic team, including Ed Lazear, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council, and Jim Nussle, director of the Office of Management and Budget, convened on a CNBC panel earlier this week [week ending Fri Oct 26] and confidently forecast that the economy would avoid a recession. As they uttered their platitudes, we learned that housing sales plunged again, with national inventories of unsold homes hitting a new record high, and that Merrill Lynch disclosed nearly $8 billion in losses. Set against this backdrop of deteriorating economic news, it would have been more honest, and perhaps more effective, if the Administration team came on stage in clown makeup and oversize shoes.

The group's most entertaining routine could be described as the "falling dollar hot potato". It is a testament to the professionalism of CNBC host Dylan Ratigan that he was able to suppress howls of laughter while the economists scrambled to avoid any discussion of the dollar by claiming that only the President and the Secretary of the Treasury were allowed to comment. (Of course the only thing Bush or Paulson will utter on the subject is the all too familiar mantra "a strong dollar is in our national interest.") How can the leading economic policy makers in government refuse to discuss the value of our money, which is arguably the single most important part of the economy? Why is the subject taboo? Perhaps they feel that anything they say will only inspire less confidence in the dollar? In reality, the Administration is persuing a policy of "benign neglect".

In addition to the dollar dance, the wacky economists also provided some laughs on a variety of other subjects.

Regarding the California wildfires, the panel reassured us that the resilient U.S. economy would weather the storm, much as it did with hurricane Katrina. However, as state and federal officials promise unlimited funds to rebuild thousands of burned homes, they conveniently ignore the fact that we must put the tab on our national charge card. The ability to postpone pain by borrowing from abroad is not evidence of economic resilience but vulnerability. A truly resilient economy has ample domestic savings to cover these vicissitudes itself. America has yet to pay the costs associated with a string of natural disasters, the bills for which will likely come due much sooner than anyone seems to realize.

The Administration gang also told us that the American economy will benefit once China moves to an economy based on consumption rather than savings (in other words, more like our economy) as they will finally begin buying more of our products. Although it is true to expect that the Chinese will inevitably start spending more, it is ridiculous to assume that it will benefit the United States. When the Chinese begin spending they will simply snap up their own abundant production and send fewer goods to America [[at ever higher prices: normxxx]]. As the Chinese reduce their savings to begin enjoying the fruits of their labor, American borrowers will lose access to their largest source of credit. The two-pronged effect on the American economy will be substantial increases in both consumer prices and interest rates— hardly the benign outcome all the President's men expect.

None seemed too concerned about the cost of funding the war in Iraq (already more costly than either Korea or Vietnam in inflation adjusted terms), which on the day of this "summit" we learned is now projected to be almost two trillion dollars. Their lack of concern likely reflects their belief that Americans are not the ones picking up the tab. I'm sure there is a different reaction among our foreign creditors, as they contemplate the prospects of "lending" [[gifting?: normxxx]] us that much more money knowing that a declining dollar guarantees they will never be re-paid in full. Perhaps the thought of lending us endless sums to cope with natural disaster at home and man-made ones abroad will shock foreigners to their collective senses, prompting them to finally cut us off.

On housing we were once again told the problems would be contained. Such upbeat pronouncements should be wearing thin in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary. When will people begin to grasp that the trillions of dollars of mortgage loans financed by Wall Street will never be repaid in full and that the losses for lenders will be staggering?

[ Normxxx Here:  Of course, you must realized that most of those lenders are you and I; the small amount of toxic MBSs still owned by the banks will be handled by passing the costs on to us through higher banking fees, etc. But the vast majority of this financial sludge was bought up by pension funds, mutual funds, state and local governments, brokers (better check to make sure your's is not likely to go bust), hedge funds, etc.— including lots of foreigners with long memories, truly innocent bystanders.  ]

Homeowners have lenders over a barrel, and soon all will know it. Once the government exempts forgiven mortgage debt from being treated as taxable income, defaults will become a national trend. Under normal circumstances, lenders have all the power, as 20% down payments and an ample supply of qualified buyers makes foreclosure a real threat [[quaint notions both: normxxx]]. However, under current circumstances, it's a completely empty threat. Lenders cannot foreclose as there are no buyers and no equity. If homeowners choose not to pay, lenders really have no choice but to renegotiate the loans. Once homeowners understand this, no one will make a mortgage payment until their loan is reduced to an amount more consistent with the actual value of their home.

While homeowners themselves will experience mere paper losses, those of the lenders will be all too real. However, even with less mortgage debt, homeowners will finally wake up to the fact that their home equity is gone. Without it, much like the Chinese today, Americans will consumer a whole lot less and hopefully save a whole lot more.


Crash Proof: How to Profit From the Coming Economic Collapse"
by Peter D. Schiff

For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my book.


Normxxx    
______________

The contents of any third-party letters/reports above do not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.

The content of any message or post by normxxx anywhere on this site is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. Such is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should always consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.