Don't Miss Out On Great Gains! - Best Investment Newsletter


Search


Monday, June 2, 2008

False Comfort

Misleading Growth Statistics Give False Comfort

By Martin Feldstein | 29 May 2008
The writer is professor of economics at Harvard University


Prepositions matter. The recent government report that US gross domestic product increased 0.6 per cent in the first quarter was very misleading. It implied that economic activity was rising in January, February and March. But the increase actually refers to the rise from the average level in the fourth quarter of 2007 to the average level in the first quarter. Monthly data since January indicate that economic activity and GDP have been declining since the start of this year.

Private sector payroll employment peaked last November and has fallen five months in a row, shedding more than 300,000 jobs. Industrial production was lower in March than in December and January. Real personal income net of taxes and transfers is also lower than in January. Real retail sales have fallen since the start of the year. Private housing starts are down 13 per cent in just the two months since January and 36 per cent from a year ago.

The government does not provide monthly estimates of GDP, but Macroeconomic Advisers, a private forecaster, constructs them using the same conceptual approach as the government uses for its quarterly estimates. The company estimates real GDP based on the price level of the year 2000. Its most recent estimates (revised figures to be published this month) show that real GDP rose from an annual $11,649bn last October to $11,701bn in December and $11,777bn in January but fell to $11,686bn in March, a decline of about $100bn in two months. GDP seemed higher during the first quarter because GDP peaked in January, and the average of the monthly figures in the first quarter ($11,711bn) is higher than the average of the monthly figures for the final quarter of 2007 ($11,675bn).

$11,711bn spread over the first quarter creates an inappropriately sanguine view of the months ahead and therefore reduces the prospect of strong action to prevent the deep decline that may otherwise occur. Carlos Gutierrez, the commerce secretary, whose department produces the GDP estimates, said the 0.6 per cent increase supported the administration's view that growth would be slower but positive in the first half. The administration predicts that after this slowdown the economy will grow more rapidly in the second half and in 2009.

While the tax rebates now under way may provide some temporary help, the combination of falling real incomes, declining household wealth and a dramatic drop in consumer confidence suggests further falls in consumer spending and GDP. But the most serious risk is that the rapid fall in house prices— down more than 12 per cent in the past year and falling at a 25 per cent rate in the past three months— will raise the number of negative-equity mortgages, leading to widespread defaults and foreclosures.

Because US mortgages are "no-recourse" loans— meaning lenders have no recourse to the house's owner beyond the value of the house— individuals with negative equity have an incentive to default. There are now an estimated 8m negative-equity mortgages— more than 15 per cent of all outstanding mortgages. Defaults are rising and foreclosures are now at twice the rate of a year ago. A downward spiral in house prices would cause a concomitant fall in household wealth and in the capital of financial institutions, potentially resulting in a deeper and longer recession than any seen in the past several decades.

Now is the time for policy action to forestall such a house price collapse. There is nothing more the Federal Reserve can do by lowering short-term interest rates or by creating new credit facilities. The Treasury proposal for voluntary negotiations between creditors and negative-equity homeowners has had relatively little success because a large share of mortgages have been securitised. Congressional proposals aimed at helping homeowners with negative-equity mortgages would at best help no more than 10 per cent of that group.

What is missing is action to prevent positive-equity mortgages from becoming negative-equity mortgages. The federal government could achieve that by providing low-interest loans with full recourse that would allow any homeowner to pay down a significant fraction of his mortgage. Homeowners would be in effect giving up the potential to default on their mortgage loans in exchange for lower interest costs.

Political tensions make it difficult to achieve such a policy and a mistakenly benign view of first-quarter growth contributes to this stalemate. Policymakers must recognise the real economic condition and act quickly.

ߧ

Normxxx    
______________

The contents of any third-party letters/reports above do not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.
The content of any message or post by normxxx anywhere on this site is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. Such is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should always consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.

No comments: