By Sarah Oconnor | 24 January 2008
|
Overnight in the US the cost of protecting Ambac and MBIA against default plummeted by over 500 basis points apiece. "This is the first positive piece of news on the monolines for a very long time…the market seems to believe some sort of deal will be struck, whether it’s this or a different one," said Andrea Cicione at BNP Paribas. But he urged caution, stressing that the plan was in the early stages. "Some banks are unwilling to get involved, they would prefer the government to step in," he said. "We’ve seen similar initiatives fail, like the super SIV plan."
Geraud Charpin at UBS agreed. "The good news is that the US authorities have shown that they do not want to see a collapse of the monolines. The bad news is that the banks are the ones asked to provide capital, something they do not have in the first place and therefore need to raise elsewhere," he said in a note. The FT reported overnight that the banks are being asked to contribute up to $15 billion for a rescue plan.
Meanwhile, the cost of protecting Societe Generale’s debt against default tightened by 13 basis points according to BNP Paris prices after the French bank said an "exceptional fraud" by a rogue trader, [[Gee; where have we heard this before?: normxxx]] along with big writedowns, had forced it into an emergency €5.5bn share issue. Analysts said spreads had moved tighter because the one-off hit wasn’t as bad as the rumours circulating the markets on Wednesday had predicted. The bank also wrote down €550 million on its counterparty exposure to monolines, including ACA, Ambac and MBIA [[Hey, it's only OP money!* : normxxx]].
* Other People's
ߧ
Normxxx
______________
The contents of any third-party letters/reports above do not necessarily reflect the opinions or viewpoint of normxxx. They are provided for informational/educational purposes only.
The content of any message or post by normxxx anywhere on this site is not to be construed as constituting market or investment advice. Such is intended for educational purposes only. Individuals should always consult with their own advisors for specific investment advice.
No comments:
Post a Comment